an axiological survey
Question:
Could you read, and love, a literary work by someone whom you personally know to be a crappy human being?
I'm just wondering how the numbers will break down, so please answer, however briefly.
Two potentially biasing facts:
- I get an impression from most people I know that their answer, with very few caveats, is no;
- I'm not sure what my own answer is.
One more twist:
- he was an antisemite and owned slaves and beat his wife and made enemies everywhere, but these passages are immortal,
vs.
- he treats his MFA students like shit -- you should ask X about it sometime -- so every time people praise him I shudder.
So?
Comments
Huh. I guess puritanism really is back. "And this time it's personal." If anything, I've usually felt odd in having so much of an overlap between work I like and creators I like and respect. The overlap's still far from 100%, though, so my answer has to be yes.
By the way, I see a pretty big difference between the two declaratives of your twist. They could be brought closer together if the first one went "he's an antisemite and owns slaves and beats his wife and makes enemies everywhere, so every time my sister praises him I shudder." The shuddering comes from the possibility that praise is going to make the world worse, right? With living assholes, it often does. With dead assholes, praise can encourage emulation, but that seems more the fault of the living emulators than the dead author.
But on the rest of it, I understand.
And generally I tend to treat sceptically students' complaints about their professors. As much as I don't listen to professors complaining about their students. Isn't complaining just a part of the game?